Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Examples of Expressive Essay Topics

Examples of Expressive Essay TopicsThere are a few examples of expository essay topics that you can use to become a better writer. You can try writing an example of an expository essay topic based on your own experience or you can research a topic and come up with a topic that you have some experience with. Here are a few examples of expository essay topics. The examples below are condensed for ease of reading.If you are writing about something you are familiar with, like your sister or your friend, you can use your experiences as an example of an expository essay topic. In this situation, you can write about what you would do if you were in her shoes or what you would do if your friend were to meet someone new. You can write about your experiences about what she would do. This topic has already been written about and you can use the experiences as an example of what a reader should be thinking about.This is another example of an expository essay topic. You could be writing about a p erson who you are considering buying a house with. Or you could be writing about the needs of a certain culture that you are studying. You can use the experiences of another person as an example of what to do if you were to buy a house in that culture.You can also use an example as an example of an expository essay topic, if you are writing about what could happen in a restaurant. You can think about what would happen if something were to happen in a restaurant you have never been to before. If you really need to put a restaurant management into your expository essay, you can think about this.You can also use an example as an example of an expository essay topic, if you are writing about a market. If you are writing about a market and the products it has to offer, you can think about what the market should look like in five years. Or you can think about how it has changed from five years ago. Use the market to reflect on changes in the economy. Or you can use the market to reflect o n how the economy has changed.Another example of an expository essay topic is if you are writing about what people have to say about their favorite company. You can use this as an example of what the public should be thinking about. Or you can think about what the public should think about if you were trying to sell your company. This is an example of an expository essay topic that gives you ideas to think about.As you can see, there are many examples of expository essay topics that you can use to write your own expository essay. And once you have written a sample essay, you can then use this sample essay as the basis for another one and this will continue to produce more examples of expository essay topics.

Friday, May 15, 2020

William James - 787 Words

William James (1842-1910) William James was a philosopher and psychologist but was most well known in the field of Psychology for developing the philosophy of pragmatism, or the Functionalist theory: Theory of mental life and behavior that is concerned with how an organism uses its perceptual abilities to function in its environment. He was also the first Psychologist to be born in America. William James was born on January 11, 1842 in New York City. His father, Henry James Sr. was a Swednborgian theologian, and one of his brothers was the great novelist Henry James. Throughout his youth, William attended private schools in the United States and Europe. He later attended the Lawrence Scientific School at Harvard University†¦show more content†¦William finally left Harvard University in 1907 and later that year, his later lectures were published in Pragmatism: A New Name for Old Ways of Thinking. This Publication basically summed up William#8217;s contributions to the t heory of pragmatism. Pragmatism was first used by an American logician named C. S. Peirce which William expanded upon it, generalizing the pragmatic method, and developing it from the logicalShow MoreRelatedWilliam Clifford And William James1091 Words   |  5 PagesSince the 19th century, William Clifford and William James have been the foremost religious theorist and have attempted to answer significant creation and theological mysteries. However, Clifford and James have varying views on the belief debate, each formulating a rational argument of what the basis for belief should be. Clifford’s, Ethics of Belief and James’ The Will to Believe outline their respective arguments which are vastly similar and but have marked differences. Both articles will be examinedRead MoreAnalysis Of William James829 Words   |  4 Pages William James was an American philosopher and psychologist who specialized in Pragmatism and philosophy related to such. He led a philosophica l revolution in the USA and would make the philosophy known as  ¨Pragmatism very well known. In his book  ¨The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy, William explains different philosophical beliefs while also challenging them and supporting the right to believe in a religion or even life itself. William James style of writing is moreRead More William James Essay764 Words   |  4 Pages William James was a philosopher and psychologist but was most well known in the field of Psychology for developing the philosophy of pragmatism, or the Functionalist theory: Theory of mental life and behavior that is concerned with how an organism uses its perceptual abilities to function in its environment. He was also the first Psychologist to be born in America.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  William James was born on January 11, 1842 in New York City. His father, Henry James Sr. was a Swednborgian theologian, andRead MoreThe Ethics Of Belief By William James972 Words   |  4 PagesBelieve is a lecture that was presented by William James in 1896, it specifically defends that one can choose to believe in a religion without prior evidence of its truth. William James was a well-distinguished philosopher as well as a psychologist and a physician. He with a few other philosophers like Charles sanders Pierce and John Dewey were fundamental in establishing modern philosophy in America and are thought to be the founding fathers of pragmatism. James taught at several universities includingRead MoreRene Descartes And William James1226 Words   |  5 Pagesanswer and question it no further. However in the back of our minds we all want to know the truth, and we will eventually conjure up a reason why what we accept as truth, in fact, the truth. Two very prominent philosophers, Renà © Descartes, and William James were concerned with truth and how people come to believe and accept something as true or false. They believed that there is a very definite truth, but they mapped out different routes in order to get to the place where truth could be found. Renà ©Read MoreFriedrich Nietzsche And William James974 Words   |  4 PagesFriedrich Nietzsche and William James were philosophers who examined the search for truth and its application in modern society. While both scholars were contemporaries and concentrated on the function of truth, Nietzsche’s philosophy advocated a scientific approach which renounced all religious frameworks, while James’ theory enabled one to find truth even in the metaphysical. In â€Å"The Portable Nietzsche,† Nietzsche investigates the meaning of truth in the apparent world and its relationship toRead MoreWilliam James And John Dewey930 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam James, and John Dewey are well-known for their contributions to early psychology. Both were highly influential in the transition from mental philosophy to scientific psychology. This transition involved moving from a narrow focus of consciousness structure to the psychological study of the purpose, and processes of human functioning. These psychologists used their own reflections to attempt the separation of conscious experience into elements. James conceived a more practical, and dynamicRead MoreWilliam James And Early American Psychology997 Words   |  4 PagesWilliam James and Early American Psychology When one thinks of American psychology, one cannot help but think of William James. James’s contributions to psychology remain influential to this day. For starters, he helped move American psychology away from philosophy and towards a science. Although not a laboratory scientist, James is considered one of the founders of American psychology because of his scientific ideas. James proposed that a habit is developed as a result of our complex nervous systemsRead MoreWilliam James : A Unique Interpretation Of Pragmatism1024 Words   |  5 PagesWilliam James is one important philosopher we have discussed in our lectures. James brings a unique interpretation of pragmatism. Pragmatism is an approach to assessing the truth of meaning for beliefs, based on their practical use. James believed that a belief is true, if the results of its implication are satisfactory. In addition, James believed that unpractical beliefs couldn’t be rejected because our different human experienc e yield different truths. I find James argument compelling becauseRead MoreBaron dHolbach and William James on Free Will and Determinism1192 Words   |  5 PagesBaron dHolbach and William James on Free Will and Determinism 3. Discuss the issue between Baron dHolbach and William James on free will and determinism? Before we can discuss the issue between Baron dHolbach and William James we have to know the definitions of the items the issue is about. Free will according to the Encarta encyclopedia is The power or ability of the human mind to choose a course of action or make a decision without being subject to restraints imposed by antecedent

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Comparing Women in Raisin In the Sun, House On Mango...

Roles of Women in A Raisin In the Sun, The House On Mango Street, and A Yellow Raft In Blue Water A Raisin In the Sun, The House On Mango Street, and A Yellow Raft In Blue Water all contain strong, defined images of women. These women control and are controlled. They are oppressed and liberated. Standing tall, they are confident and independent. Hunched low, they are vulnerable and insecure. They are grandmothers, aunts, mothers, wives, lovers, friends, sisters and children. Although they span a wide range of years and roles, a common thread is woven through all of their lives, a thread which confronts them day in and day out. This thread is the challenge they face as minority women in America to find liberation and freedom†¦show more content†¦Mama is stable and solid, unwavering with the winds of change and the force of opposition. She takes charge of the Younger family with the strength and determination of a woman who has the experience and wisdom of living. With this sensibility she will not be challenged in the authority she holds, which is evidenced by the way she speaks also to Walter. I dont low no yellin in this house, Walter Lee, and you know it (Hansberry 70). Her strength is also apparent as she refuses defeat even though they face opposition from Karl Lindner and the prospect of hostility and harassment in their new neighborhood. Mama stands firm in her decision to move into Clybourne Park. She is fully aware of the danger that will accompany their move, but says only, Father, give us strength (Hansberry 120). A similar woman in A Yellow Raft In Blue Water who shows strength and competence is Evelyn. Evelyn carries herself with a confidence that is evident upon first meeting her. She doesnt need to speak to Father Tom, only to stand up to him with a single glare. Evelyn beats him down with her gleaming look, reads him his rights, and gives him no more chances (Dorris 126). She gives Rayona the courage to ride for Foxy in the rodeo. Evelyn got me on that horse and kept putting me back (Dorris 120). Evelyn shares her strength with Rayona and begins Rayonas journey toward becoming a strong woman herself. Mama and Evelyn both use their strength to inspire others. As a

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

A Literary Critique of C. S. Lewis The Case for C Essay Example For Students

A Literary Critique of C. S. Lewis: The Case for C Essay hristianity, The Worlds Last NightA Literary Critique of C. S. Lewis: The Case for Christianity, The Worlds Last Night and Problem with PainI. IntroductionII. Brief Biographical InformationIII. The Case for Christianity- Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe IV. The Problem with Pain- Divine Omnipotence V.The Worlds Last Night- The Efficacy of Prayer VI. Conclusion A Critique of C. S. Lewis A Relativist said, The world does not exist, England does not exist, Oxford does not exist and I am confident that I do not Exist! When Lewis was asked to reply, he stood up and said, How am I to talk to a man whos not there?' C. S. Lewis: A BiographyClive Staples Lewis was born, in 1898, in Belfast. C. S. Lewis was educated at various schools in England. In 1914, Lewis began studying Latin, Greek, French, German and Italian under the private tuition of W. T. Kirkpatrick. He then moved to Oxford where his studies were interrupted by World War I (1917). Two years later he was back in Oxford resuming his studies. In 1924, Lewis was elected to teach Literature and Language at Magdalen College, Oxford and remained there till 1954. During this time period in his life, Lewis wrote the majority of his work. Lewis moved to Cambridge for the remainder of his life teaching Medieval and Renaissance Literature.1C. S. Lewis was a man dedicated to the pursuit of truth who believed in argument, in disputation, and in the dialectic of Reason. . . 2 He began his pursuit of truth as an atheist and ended up as a Christian. His works the Problem of Pain and Mere Christianity dealt with issues he struggled with. Mere Christianity consists of three separate radio broadcasts. One of the broadcasts was titled The Case ForChristianity. In The Case For Christianity, Lewis discussed two crucial topics in his apologetic defense of Christianity. They were the Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe and What Christians Believe. This critique will address the first chapter. Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe, can be broken into three parts. The first deals with moral law and its existence. The second addresses the idea of a power or mind behind the universe, who, is intensely interested in right conduct. Also that this power or Godis good. Good as in the area of truth, not soft and sympathetic. The third point moves to Christianity, its attributes and why it was necessary for the long round-about approach .The law of nature binds humans as would the laws of gravity apply to a falling stone. It is called the law of nature because it does not need to be taught.Lewis points out that an odd individual may exist here and there who didnt know it, just as you find s few people who are colour-blind or have no ear for tune. But taking the race as a whole, they thought that the human idea of Decent Behavior was obvious to every one.3Lewis brilliantly defended his statement of natural laws existence. Two arguments, which argue for relativity, posted against him are the herd instincts or genetic inborn in us ( i.e. motherly love, survival or sexual impulses) and that which is taught socially or learned. Historically, these to interpretations of human behavior have clashed, however, he suggest that reason is above both. He clarifies his position by classifying impulses as separate from the decision to follow the impulse itself. The learned argument is refuted by his analogy of a boy on the island who is unaware of the existence of the process of multiplication. He never attended school and learned them.The education would be classified as human convention. This human convention, consequently, did not invent multiplication just as it did not invent the law of nature.However, this comparison is based on a false assumption. The law of nature, as Lewis argued, is not taught but some how exists as an inherent part of the human psyche. This law also presents itself in the form of decisions and actions in line with what ought to be done. There is no school-room which imparts this law and the practice of it.Consequently, mathematics needs to be taught and learned. Jesus Christ Essay If pain exists in this universe then God is either not truly good or lacks power to stop it.Lewis dedicates a chapter in his work, The Problem of Pain, to explaining this apparent contradiction. He also tackles the concept of impossibility in relation to omnipotence. The dialectic analysis consists of things intrinsically possible and the things intrinsically impossible. 7 A God of omnipotent power can do all things intrinsically possible. The reference to God performing the intrinsically impossible is nonsensical and foolishness to Lewis. The attribution of miracles and supernatural occurrences to God can be explained as possible, though humans perceive it as impossible.Clyde S. Kilby argues the point of free will and Gods power in context to Lewis work on the existence of pain. Kilby states that: Suppose that in my eagerness to be perfectly happy I persuade God day after day to change all prevailing conditions to my wishes. But if all conditions follow my wishes, it is obvious that they cannot possibly follow your wishes also and you will therefore be deprived of your freedom. Freedom is impossible in a world subject to whim. 8 Therefore, pains existence in a universe created by a good and omnipotent God is logically feasible.The next work by C. S. Lewis is The Worlds Last Night. This work contains an essay on prayer. Lewis examined prayer and its purpose by asking certain questions. Questions like, What evidence would prove the efficacy of prayer? 9 If a prayer is answered, how can you ever know it was not going to happen anyway?10 The answer to a prayer does no provide irrefutable evidence of the efficacy of prayer.Does prayer work? Lewis states that prayer is not a machine by which one could plug in the right phrases and get the results. He defines prayer as either a sheer illusion or a personal contact between embryonic, incomplete persons (ourselves)and the utterly concrete Person.11 If in fact prayer is a sheer illusion its purpose would be for the vocalization of wishful thinking. Whether the desired result comes to pass is completely based on fate or the simple fact that it was going to happen anyway.If is indeed a contact to an utterly concrete Person to what avail?What advice can a finite and intellectually limited person give to an omniscient, omnipresent, omnipotent being? Lewis states, Our act, when we pray, must not, any more than all our other acts, be separate from the continuous act of God Himself, in which alone all finite causes operate. 12 Prayer, according to Lewis, is a statement according to the will or actions of God.The will of God is knowable according to Lewis. However, he does not mention what Gods will was/is. In the following paragraphs Lewis conveniently changes his direction addressing an other aspect of prayer. He also does not explain how one goes about finding Gods will or why would God want to hear billions of little voices telling Him what His will is. Lewis does a poor job justifying the efficacy of prayer.It can be seen that C. S. Lewis analysis was always in terms of black and white or extremes. Any other alternative is either foolishness or unthinkable. He wielded the dialectic process of analysis as though it were second nature to him. His well trained mind synthesized theological dilemmas for the layman. Constantly referring to himself as a layman himself, Lewis left the details of theological doctrine and philosophy to those who were experts. He was only interested in his own personal questions concerning Christianity and sharing his well thought out answers to others.This critique of C. S. Lewis contains various selections from three of his books. The first work address the topic of Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe. In this section Lewis argues for the existence of absolutes, God and the validity of Christianity. The second work which was examined was The Problem of Pain. A selection on the omnipotent power of a good God was discussed in terms of the intrinsically impossible and the existence of pain.Thirdly, the efficacy of prayer was addressed in critical questioning of the purpose its existence.